Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Galil damage (avg/round)
16.85.6
HE damage (avg/round)
183.4
HE damage (avg/round)
17.53.4
HE damage (avg/round)
13.53.4
Damage (total/round)
41973
Player score (round)
40411012
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
HE damage (total/round)
10626.8
HE damage (total/round)
16826.8
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Train
60%
Inferno
55%
Overpass
50%
Vertigo
40%
Dust II
31%
Nuke
21%
Mirage
7%
Last 5 maps
Train
0%
0
13
Inferno
80%
5
3
Overpass
50%
2
3
Vertigo
40%
5
4
Dust II
88%
8
0
Nuke
29%
7
1
Mirage
67%
6
2
Last 5 maps
Train
60%
5
0
Inferno
25%
4
2
Overpass
0%
0
3
Vertigo
0%
0
6
Dust II
57%
7
0
Nuke
50%
4
4
Mirage
60%
5
3
Info
Match analysis of BIG vs ENCE by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between BIG and ENCE, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-1, on the following maps: Dust II, Nuke, Inferno, and victory was secured by BIG. The MVP of this match was XANTARES.
BIG analytics
The team BIG secured 42 out of 84 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Dust II, Inferno. They also successfully set 3 bombs during the match.
The standout players for BIG were XANTARES contributed 73 kills and tabseN contributed 71 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 31996 overall damage.
On the defensive side, BIG held their ground firmly, successfully defending 26 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
ENCE analytics
The team ENCE managed to secure 42 out of 84 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 8 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for ENCE were allu contributed 56 kills and Aerial contributed 61 kills. 29038 of total damage by ENCE could not prevent BIG from securing the victory
On the defensive side, ENCE struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 27 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments