0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Lineups
Lineup
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
100%
Vertigo
56%
Nuke
50%
Ancient
33%
Overpass
28%
Inferno
21%
Anubis
12%
Mirage
0%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
100%
2
0
Vertigo
56%
39
3
Nuke
0%
0
51
Ancient
33%
24
24
Overpass
58%
24
5
Inferno
61%
23
20
Anubis
62%
29
0
Mirage
57%
23
14
Last 5 maps
Dust II
0%
0
0
Vertigo
0%
1
0
Nuke
50%
2
0
Ancient
0%
0
0
Overpass
86%
7
0
Inferno
40%
5
0
Anubis
50%
4
0
Mirage
57%
7
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- lwlll
- lddwl
Info
Match analysis of BIG Academy vs SNOGARD Dragons by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between BIG Academy and SNOGARD Dragons, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Inferno, and victory was secured by BIG Academy. The MVP of this match was ArroW.
BIG Academy analytics
The team BIG Academy secured 17 out of 24 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno. They also successfully set 3 bombs during the match.
The standout players for BIG Academy were ArroW contributed 60 kills and prosus contributed 56 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 28349 overall damage.
On the defensive side, BIG Academy held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
SNOGARD Dragons analytics
The team SNOGARD Dragons managed to secure 7 out of 24 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 2 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for SNOGARD Dragons were ND contributed 45 kills and pr1metapz contributed 49 kills. 21311 of total damage by SNOGARD Dragons could not prevent BIG Academy from securing the victory
On the defensive side, SNOGARD Dragons struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments