0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Lineups
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
28%
Overpass
26%
Mirage
14%
Nuke
8%
Inferno
5%
Ancient
3%
Dust II
0%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
78%
9
23
Overpass
70%
10
13
Mirage
25%
12
7
Nuke
56%
9
4
Inferno
35%
17
13
Ancient
33%
6
14
Dust II
0%
3
20
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
50%
24
3
Overpass
44%
9
4
Mirage
39%
23
3
Nuke
48%
21
2
Inferno
40%
10
16
Ancient
36%
11
9
Dust II
0%
0
29
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wllwl
- llllw
Info
Match analysis of BIG Academy vs eSuba by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between BIG Academy and eSuba, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Vertigo, Nuke, and victory was secured by BIG Academy. The MVP of this match was Krimbo.
BIG Academy analytics
The team BIG Academy secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Vertigo, Nuke. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for BIG Academy were Krimbo contributed 53 kills and hyped contributed 56 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 29093 overall damage.
On the defensive side, BIG Academy held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
eSuba analytics
The team eSuba managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for eSuba were Levi contributed 55 kills and Pechyn contributed 54 kills. 26219 of total damage by eSuba could not prevent BIG Academy from securing the victory
On the defensive side, eSuba struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments