BIG Academy Scoreboard Inferno (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

26

19

4

+7

94

5:2

7

0

7.2

+16%

16

12

7

+4

72

3:3

4

2

6.7

-2%

20

18

4

+2

73

2:3

5

1

6.2

+1%

16

17

2

-1

60

4:3

4

0

5.5

-7%

13

15

4

-2

53

1:1

2

0

5.2

-10%

Total

91

81

21

+10

352

15:12

22

3

6.2

-1%

eSuba Scoreboard Inferno (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

23

19

5

+4

79

1:3

6

0

6.2

+14%

16

17

3

-1

65

3:1

3

0

5.6

-4%

17

18

2

-1

65

2:5

5

0

5.4

+6%

14

18

4

-4

62

4:4

3

0

5.3

-15%

11

19

3

-8

45

2:2

2

0

4.6

-24%

Total

81

91

17

-10

315

12:15

19

0

5.4

-5%

Teams advantage Inferno (M1)
Info
Map Analysis of BIG Academy vs eSuba by the Bo3.gg Team

BIG Academy on Inferno Analysis

BIG Academy demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 28 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for BIG Academy on Inferno were prosus, who contributed 26 kills, and Krimbo, who added 16 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 9865 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, BIG Academy held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


eSuba on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for eSuba, as they managed to secure 12 out of 28 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for eSuba on Inferno included Pechyn, who contributed 23 kills, and Levi, who added 16 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8812 total damage, eSuba couldn't prevent BIG Academy from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, eSuba struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date