0 Comments
Teams advantage Inferno (M1)
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Ancient
P
56%
Overpass
B
53%
Mirage
B
33%
Inferno
P
29%
Dust II
P
24%
Nuke
B
3%
Vertigo
0%
Last 5 maps
Ancient
44%
25
2
Overpass
53%
17
1
Mirage
33%
12
10
Inferno
38%
29
1
Dust II
43%
14
2
Nuke
53%
15
4
Vertigo
0%
0
16
Last 5 maps
Ancient
100%
1
1
Overpass
0%
2
0
Mirage
0%
0
2
Inferno
67%
6
0
Dust II
67%
6
0
Nuke
50%
2
1
Vertigo
0%
0
2
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- llwll
- wlwlw
Info
Map Analysis of Beyond Possible vs PIGNOUF by the Bo3.gg Team
PIGNOUF on Inferno Analysis
PIGNOUF demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 0 out of 20 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for PIGNOUF on Inferno were Kursy, who contributed 21 kills, and Neityu, who added 21 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 8610 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, PIGNOUF held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Beyond Possible on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Beyond Possible, as they managed to secure 20 out of 20 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Beyond Possible on Inferno included rafftu, who contributed 17 kills, and SAIKY, who added 13 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6269 total damage, Beyond Possible couldn't prevent PIGNOUF from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, Beyond Possible struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 15 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments