0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Deagle kills on a map
41.6427
USP kills on a map
41.5986
Speed Round (sec)
00:26s01:55s
Speed Round (sec)
00:32s01:55s
USP kills on a map
41.5986
Assists on a map
11.974.4746
Player score (round)
35861010
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Ancient
48%
Inferno
39%
Nuke
34%
Mirage
30%
Vertigo
19%
Anubis
14%
Dust II
9%
Last 5 maps
Ancient
65%
23
2
Inferno
0%
0
21
Nuke
47%
17
3
Mirage
30%
10
9
Vertigo
69%
16
1
Anubis
33%
15
10
Dust II
44%
9
6
Last 5 maps
Ancient
17%
18
3
Inferno
39%
18
0
Nuke
13%
8
2
Mirage
0%
0
5
Vertigo
50%
16
0
Anubis
47%
30
0
Dust II
53%
17
0
Info
Match analysis of Apogee vs ADEPTS by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Apogee and ADEPTS, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Ancient, Anubis, and victory was secured by Apogee. The MVP of this match was Prism.
Apogee analytics
The team Apogee secured 26 out of 42 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient, Anubis. They also successfully set 8 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Apogee were Prism contributed 34 kills and hypex contributed 34 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 16008 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Apogee held their ground firmly, successfully defending 12 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
ADEPTS analytics
The team ADEPTS managed to secure 16 out of 42 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 1 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for ADEPTS were Chuckyy contributed 29 kills and SBT contributed 29 kills. 13774 of total damage by ADEPTS could not prevent Apogee from securing the victory
On the defensive side, ADEPTS struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 10 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments