0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Speed Round (sec)
00:35s01:55s
Player score (round)
35531011
Damage (total/round)
40073
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
AK47 kills on a map
156.5888
GLOCK kills on a map
31.4456
GLOCK kills on a map
31.4456
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Inferno
61%
Vertigo
18%
Nuke
12%
Anubis
9%
Ancient
2%
Mirage
0%
Last 5 maps
Inferno
61%
28
16
Vertigo
68%
31
5
Nuke
38%
13
30
Anubis
50%
8
56
Ancient
57%
40
10
Mirage
67%
36
7
Last 5 maps
Inferno
0%
0
66
Vertigo
50%
10
22
Nuke
50%
22
11
Anubis
41%
27
18
Ancient
55%
29
14
Mirage
67%
33
2
Info
Match analysis of Metizport vs BetBoom by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Metizport and BetBoom, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-2, on the following maps: Mirage, Vertigo, Ancient, and victory was secured by BetBoom. The MVP of this match was s1ren.
BetBoom analytics
The team BetBoom secured 36 out of 63 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage, Ancient. They also successfully set 11 bombs during the match.
The standout players for BetBoom were s1ren contributed 47 kills and zorte contributed 43 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 21890 overall damage.
On the defensive side, BetBoom held their ground firmly, successfully defending 18 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Metizport analytics
The team Metizport managed to secure 27 out of 63 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 2 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Metizport were ztr contributed 42 kills and nilo contributed 43 kills. 20998 of total damage by Metizport could not prevent BetBoom from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Metizport struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 18 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments