BESTIA Scoreboard Anubis (M3)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

23

15

5

+8

91

1:1

7

0

7.1

+22%

15

20

5

-5

75

3:4

3

0

5.7

-8%

12

14

3

-2

51

1:3

3

1

5.0

-9%

11

17

4

-6

61

2:6

3

0

4.9

-15%

6

17

3

-11

43

1:2

1

1

4.2

-38%

Total

67

83

20

-16

322

8:16

17

2

5.4

-10%

Sharks Scoreboard Anubis (M3)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

20

14

7

+6

90

7:3

6

1

7.6

+19%

20

14

8

+6

89

3:0

4

0

7.1

+25%

17

14

6

+3

71

1:2

3

1

6.4

+8%

17

14

1

+3

77

2:2

5

0

6.1

0%

9

12

7

-3

51

3:1

2

0

5.2

-19%

Total

83

68

29

+15

377

16:8

20

2

6.5

+7%

Teams advantage Anubis (M3)
Info
Map Analysis of BESTIA vs Sharks by the Bo3.gg Team

Sharks on Anubis Analysis

Sharks demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 13 out of 24 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Sharks on Anubis were rdnzao, who contributed 20 kills, and pepe, who added 20 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 9050 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Anubis, Sharks held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


BESTIA on Anubis Analysis

Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for BESTIA, as they managed to secure 11 out of 24 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for BESTIA on Anubis included tomaszin, who contributed 23 kills, and luchov, who added 15 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7720 total damage, BESTIA couldn't prevent Sharks from securing victory on Anubis


On the defensive side of Anubis, BESTIA struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date