Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:33s01:30s
Tec-9 damage (avg/round)
10.13.4
Player score (round)
41201012
Player score (round)
39521012
Player's aces
1
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Clutch (opponents)
2
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Nuke
44%
Overpass
37%
Anubis
33%
Vertigo
31%
Inferno
30%
Mirage
14%
Ancient
5%
Last 5 maps
Nuke
100%
4
23
Overpass
63%
16
0
Anubis
83%
12
9
Vertigo
0%
0
34
Inferno
77%
13
4
Mirage
45%
11
6
Ancient
60%
15
2
Last 5 maps
Nuke
56%
18
4
Overpass
100%
1
17
Anubis
50%
6
6
Vertigo
31%
13
4
Inferno
47%
15
6
Mirage
59%
17
5
Ancient
55%
11
5
Info
Match analysis of BESTIA vs Meta by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between BESTIA and Meta, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Mirage, Anubis, and victory was secured by BESTIA. The MVP of this match was deco.
BESTIA analytics
The team BESTIA secured 32 out of 46 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage, Anubis. They also successfully set 3 bombs during the match.
The standout players for BESTIA were deco contributed 42 kills and tomaszin contributed 40 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 19590 overall damage.
On the defensive side, BESTIA held their ground firmly, successfully defending 21 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Meta analytics
The team Meta managed to secure 14 out of 46 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 3 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Meta were supLexN1 contributed 34 kills and abr contributed 28 kills. 14954 of total damage by Meta could not prevent BESTIA from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Meta struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments