BESTIA Scoreboard Inferno (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

4

4

0

0

108

0:0

1

0

7.3

+19%

3

4

1

-1

93

0:1

1

0

6.3

+4%

1

4

1

-3

71

0:1

0

0

4.4

-40%

2

3

0

-1

50

0:2

1

0

4.3

-22%

1

3

0

-2

25

0:0

0

0

4.1

-44%

Total

11

18

2

-7

347

0:4

3

0

5.3

-17%

Case Scoreboard Inferno (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

6

2

1

+4

145

3:0

2

0

10.0

+73%

4

1

1

+3

124

0:0

1

0

8.2

+78%

5

2

1

+3

96

1:0

1

0

7.7

+48%

3

2

0

+1

79

0:0

1

0

6.2

+18%

0

4

0

-4

23

0:0

0

0

3.1

-73%

Total

18

11

3

+7

466

4:0

5

0

7.0

+29%

Teams advantage Inferno (M2)
Info
Map Analysis of BESTIA vs Case by the Bo3.gg Team

Case on Inferno Analysis

Case demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 3 out of 4 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Case on Inferno were urban0, who contributed 6 kills, and RICIOLI, who added 4 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 1865 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, Case held their ground firmly, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


BESTIA on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for BESTIA, as they managed to secure 1 out of 4 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for BESTIA on Inferno included zock, who contributed 4 kills, and Noktse, who added 3 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 1386 total damage, BESTIA couldn't prevent Case from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, BESTIA struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date