0 Comments
Teams advantage
Score
5.9
6
Dust II0.2
Win Rounds
9
13
Dust II4
Kills
74
56
Dust II-18
Damage
8.04K
6.26K
Dust II-1781
Economy
478.65K
346.45K
Dust II-132200
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Speed Round (sec)
00:31s01:55s
Speed Round (sec)
00:30s01:55s
Multikill x-
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Nuke
100%
Dust II
67%
Anubis
50%
Mirage
40%
Ancient
33%
Last 5 maps
Nuke
0%
0
0
Dust II
0%
1
0
Anubis
0%
0
0
Mirage
0%
0
0
Ancient
0%
0
0
Last 5 maps
Nuke
100%
1
0
Dust II
67%
3
0
Anubis
50%
4
0
Mirage
40%
5
0
Ancient
33%
3
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wlwll
Info
Match analysis of BeerLeagyue vs ASCEND by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between BeerLeagyue and ASCEND, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Dust II, and victory was secured by ASCEND. The MVP of this match was Zoker.
ASCEND analytics
The team ASCEND secured 13 out of 22 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Dust II. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for ASCEND were Zoker contributed 16 kills and sh1rax contributed 13 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 6262 overall damage.
On the defensive side, ASCEND held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
BeerLeagyue analytics
The team BeerLeagyue managed to secure 9 out of 22 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 1 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for BeerLeagyue were ajn contributed 18 kills and SaberCat contributed 15 kills. 8043 of total damage by BeerLeagyue could not prevent ASCEND from securing the victory
On the defensive side, BeerLeagyue struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments