Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
M4A1 kills on a map
84.4189
M4A1 kills on a map
94.4189
AK47 kills on a map
116.5019
Headshots on a map
13.940.3159
Speed Round (sec)
00:15s01:55s
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Knife kills
11
Lineups
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
B
50%
Mirage
G
18%
Dust II
0%
Inferno
0%
Ancient
0%
Anubis
0%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
50%
2
0
Mirage
22%
9
0
Dust II
0%
1
0
Inferno
0%
1
0
Ancient
0%
0
0
Anubis
0%
2
0
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Mirage
40%
5
0
Dust II
0%
1
0
Inferno
0%
0
0
Ancient
0%
2
0
Anubis
0%
0
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- lwlww
- lllwl
Info
Match analysis of BeastBagChasers vs GIGA by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between BeastBagChasers and GIGA, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Mirage, and victory was secured by GIGA. The MVP of this match was Cyclone324.
GIGA analytics
The team GIGA secured 13 out of 17 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage. They also successfully set 3 bombs during the match.
The standout players for GIGA were Cyclone324 contributed 20 kills and Slumpness contributed 19 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 7733 overall damage.
On the defensive side, GIGA held their ground firmly, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
BeastBagChasers analytics
The team BeastBagChasers managed to secure 4 out of 17 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for BeastBagChasers were z0 contributed 15 kills and Beast contributed 8 kills. 4972 of total damage by BeastBagChasers could not prevent GIGA from securing the victory
On the defensive side, BeastBagChasers struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments