0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
AK47 damage (avg/round)
58.725.2
Multikill x-
4
USP damage (avg/round)
17.64.8
GLOCK kills on a map
31.4516
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
17.74.2
Flash blinded on a map (opp)
7028
Shots (total/round)
9716
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Inferno
63%
Anubis
24%
Nuke
16%
Mirage
16%
Ancient
8%
Dust II
2%
Vertigo
0%
Last 5 maps
Inferno
63%
8
2
Anubis
62%
21
3
Nuke
17%
6
8
Mirage
54%
28
0
Ancient
44%
18
6
Dust II
61%
18
1
Vertigo
0%
1
11
Last 5 maps
Inferno
0%
2
6
Anubis
38%
13
0
Nuke
33%
3
2
Mirage
38%
8
1
Ancient
36%
11
0
Dust II
63%
8
0
Vertigo
0%
0
9
Info
Match analysis of BC.Game vs WW by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between BC.Game and WW, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-1, on the following maps: Mirage, Dust II, Anubis, and victory was secured by BC.Game. The MVP of this match was pr1metapz.
BC.Game analytics
The team BC.Game secured 35 out of 65 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage, Anubis. They also successfully set 4 bombs during the match.
The standout players for BC.Game were pr1metapz contributed 56 kills and GuardiaN contributed 53 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 26457 overall damage.
On the defensive side, BC.Game held their ground firmly, successfully defending 17 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
WW analytics
The team WW managed to secure 30 out of 65 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 9 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for WW were tried contributed 50 kills and ct0m contributed 44 kills. 23006 of total damage by WW could not prevent BC.Game from securing the victory
On the defensive side, WW struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 13 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments