74
56
20
+18
387
14:6
22
1
Anubis6.7
+22%
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
M4A1 kills on a map
134.4189
Openning kills on a map
72.8324
Clutch (opponents)
2
Lineups
Lineup
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Stand-in
Starter
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
100%
Ancient
60%
Vertigo
50%
Mirage
17%
Inferno
0%
Anubis
0%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
0%
1
0
Ancient
0%
1
0
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Mirage
50%
2
0
Inferno
0%
1
0
Anubis
33%
3
0
Last 5 maps
Dust II
100%
1
0
Ancient
60%
5
0
Vertigo
50%
4
0
Mirage
33%
3
0
Inferno
0%
0
0
Anubis
33%
6
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wll
- lwwll
Info
Match analysis of Banger Gang vs PeeP by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Banger Gang and PeeP, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Anubis, and victory was secured by PeeP. The MVP of this match was YumsaN.
PeeP analytics
The team PeeP secured 13 out of 20 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis. They also successfully set 3 bombs during the match.
The standout players for PeeP were YumsaN contributed 20 kills and Brilliance contributed 17 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 7737 overall damage.
On the defensive side, PeeP held their ground firmly, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Banger Gang analytics
The team Banger Gang managed to secure 7 out of 20 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 3 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Banger Gang were Viresse contributed 21 kills and hatex contributed 11 kills. 6420 of total damage by Banger Gang could not prevent PeeP from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Banger Gang struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments