0 Comments
46
74
21
-28
309
4:14
9
0
Overpass5.1
-12%
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Assists on a map
94.3808
Speed Round (sec)
00:19s01:54s
Multikill x-
4
Lineups
Lineup
- Starter
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Overpass
67%
Nuke
50%
Mirage
50%
Ancient
40%
Anubis
25%
Inferno
0%
Vertigo
0%
Last 5 maps
Overpass
100%
1
0
Nuke
0%
0
0
Mirage
0%
0
0
Ancient
0%
1
0
Anubis
0%
0
0
Inferno
0%
0
0
Vertigo
0%
1
0
Last 5 maps
Overpass
33%
6
2
Nuke
50%
10
0
Mirage
50%
10
0
Ancient
40%
15
1
Anubis
25%
4
3
Inferno
0%
0
6
Vertigo
0%
2
2
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- llll
- llwll
Info
Match analysis of BakS vs lajtbitexe by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between BakS and lajtbitexe, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Overpass, and victory was secured by BakS. The MVP of this match was Middlesex.
BakS analytics
The team BakS secured 13 out of 18 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Overpass. They also successfully set 1 bombs during the match.
The standout players for BakS were Middlesex contributed 20 kills and reyoz contributed 16 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 7903 overall damage.
On the defensive side, BakS held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
lajtbitexe analytics
The team lajtbitexe managed to secure 5 out of 18 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for lajtbitexe were ZEMO contributed 14 kills and Frontsider contributed 12 kills. 5569 of total damage by lajtbitexe could not prevent BakS from securing the victory
On the defensive side, lajtbitexe struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 1 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments