47
72
11
-25
323
10:8
8
0
-18%
Teams advantage Inferno (M1)
Records Inferno
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:35s01:28s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:31s01:28s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:28s01:28s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:32s01:28s
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
11.13.8
Molotov damage (avg/round)
9.32
Deagle damage (avg/round)
19.65.4
Deagle kills on a map
41.6865
Deagle damage (avg/round)
22.75.4
USP kills on a map
31.6136
Info
Map Analysis of Bad News Eagles vs EYEBALLERS by the Bo3.gg Team
EYEBALLERS on Inferno Analysis
EYEBALLERS demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 13 out of 18 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for EYEBALLERS on Inferno were Peppzor, who contributed 20 kills, and JW, who added 19 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 7539 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, EYEBALLERS held their ground firmly, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Bad News Eagles on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Bad News Eagles, as they managed to secure 5 out of 18 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Bad News Eagles on Inferno included rigoN, who contributed 14 kills, and juanflatroo, who added 11 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 5823 total damage, Bad News Eagles couldn't prevent EYEBALLERS from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, Bad News Eagles struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments