0 Comments
Teams advantage Vertigo (M0)
Records Vertigo
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Rounds win streak
103
Galil damage (avg/round)
176
Flash blinded on a map (opp)
6528
HE damage (avg/round)
11.63.4
Flash duration on a map (sec)
01:28s00:36s
Galil kills on a map
51.8168
Galil damage (avg/round)
19.16
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
124.2
Flash duration on a map (sec)
01:34s00:36s
Flash blinded on a map (opp)
9728
Info
Map Analysis of Tropa do Taco vs Bad News Chickens by the Bo3.gg Team
Tropa do Taco on Vertigo Analysis
Tropa do Taco demonstrated their prowers on Vertigo, securing 13 out of 24 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Tropa do Taco on Vertigo were vsm, who contributed 19 kills, and ponter, who added 16 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Vertigo, the team inflicted a total of 9282 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Vertigo, Tropa do Taco held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Bad News Chickens on Vertigo Analysis
Vertigo proved to be a challenging battleground for Bad News Chickens, as they managed to secure 11 out of 24 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Bad News Chickens on Vertigo included Skr, who contributed 23 kills, and desh, who added 19 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 9732 total damage, Bad News Chickens couldn't prevent Tropa do Taco from securing victory on Vertigo
On the defensive side of Vertigo, Bad News Chickens struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments