Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:32s01:30s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:33s01:30s
Molotov damage (avg/round)
6.42
Galil damage (avg/round)
16.75.6
USP damage (avg/round)
17.24.6
Damage (total/round)
39373
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Overpass
46%
Vertigo
38%
Ancient
27%
Nuke
16%
Anubis
14%
Inferno
11%
Mirage
9%
Last 5 maps
Overpass
0%
2
35
Vertigo
38%
21
5
Ancient
52%
21
3
Nuke
62%
21
1
Anubis
45%
11
16
Inferno
50%
8
25
Mirage
55%
11
9
Last 5 maps
Overpass
46%
24
23
Vertigo
0%
0
62
Ancient
79%
19
20
Nuke
78%
32
0
Anubis
59%
17
8
Inferno
61%
23
25
Mirage
64%
28
7
Info
Match analysis of B8 vs Aurora by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between B8 and Aurora, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Mirage, and victory was secured by Aurora. The MVP of this match was latt1kk.
Aurora analytics
The team Aurora secured 16 out of 27 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage. They also successfully set 1 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Aurora were latt1kk contributed 24 kills and Norwi contributed 20 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 10543 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Aurora held their ground firmly, successfully defending 10 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
B8 analytics
The team B8 managed to secure 11 out of 27 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 2 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for B8 were cptkurtka023 contributed 24 kills and r1nkle contributed 14 kills. 8996 of total damage by B8 could not prevent Aurora from securing the victory
On the defensive side, B8 struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments