Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:29s01:26s
Molotov damage (avg/round)
7.72
Smoke thrown on a map
2214.6931
GLOCK kills on a map
31.4456
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
134
M4A1 kills on a map
124.491
M4A1 damage (avg/round)
55.216.3
Tec-9 kills on a map
41.3023
Tec-9 damage (avg/round)
14.23.5
Trades on a map
8.973.4638
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Anubis
59%
Vertigo
38%
Inferno
23%
Ancient
15%
Mirage
7%
Nuke
1%
Dust II
0%
Last 5 maps
Anubis
59%
34
1
Vertigo
100%
5
50
Inferno
73%
15
11
Ancient
47%
36
10
Mirage
57%
44
2
Nuke
60%
25
9
Dust II
50%
2
14
Last 5 maps
Anubis
0%
0
46
Vertigo
62%
26
4
Inferno
50%
18
3
Ancient
62%
13
29
Mirage
64%
14
13
Nuke
61%
18
11
Dust II
50%
4
0
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of B8 vs AMKAL by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between B8 and AMKAL, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-2, on the following maps: Nuke, Dust II, Ancient, and victory was secured by AMKAL. The MVP of this match was npl.
AMKAL analytics
The team AMKAL secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke, Ancient. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for AMKAL were icy contributed 54 kills and TRAVIS contributed 40 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 24296 overall damage.
On the defensive side, AMKAL held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
B8 analytics
The team B8 managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for B8 were npl contributed 60 kills and headtr1ck contributed 45 kills. 25919 of total damage by B8 could not prevent AMKAL from securing the victory
On the defensive side, B8 struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments