Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
AWP kills on a map
166.5798
AWP damage (avg/round)
62.221.6
M4A1 kills on a map
124.6963
M4A1 damage (avg/round)
50.716.7
Shots (total/round)
9716
Damage (total/round)
38873
Player score (round)
34941012
Shots (total/round)
8416
Player score (round)
58361012
Player score (round)
42951012
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
75%
Ancient
68%
Inferno
56%
Mirage
55%
Overpass
38%
Nuke
33%
Vertigo
0%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
75%
8
14
Ancient
68%
22
1
Inferno
56%
27
3
Mirage
55%
11
21
Overpass
62%
13
12
Nuke
33%
15
12
Vertigo
0%
0
40
Last 5 maps
Dust II
0%
0
0
Ancient
0%
0
1
Inferno
0%
1
0
Mirage
0%
1
0
Overpass
100%
1
0
Nuke
0%
0
1
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Info
Match analysis of AVE vs X by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between AVE and X, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-1, on the following maps: Inferno, Overpass, Mirage, and victory was secured by AVE. The MVP of this match was Porya.
AVE analytics
The team AVE secured 45 out of 76 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno, Mirage. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for AVE were Porya contributed 69 kills and Raijin contributed 59 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 29819 overall damage.
On the defensive side, AVE held their ground firmly, successfully defending 28 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
X analytics
The team X managed to secure 31 out of 76 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 4 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for X were cerber contributed 53 kills and gejmzilla contributed 46 kills. 26131 of total damage by X could not prevent AVE from securing the victory
On the defensive side, X struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 17 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments