Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Headshots (total/map)
238
AK47 kills on a map
246.732
AK47 damage (avg/round)
68.925.3
Player score (round)
35051012
Player score (round)
47371012
Player score (round)
34721012
Damage (total/round)
45673
Player score (round)
52051012
Player's aces
1
Multikill x-
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
50%
Overpass
38%
Mirage
25%
Nuke
18%
Inferno
9%
Ancient
5%
Dust II
2%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
0%
0
14
Overpass
38%
8
2
Mirage
20%
5
7
Nuke
80%
5
6
Inferno
54%
13
0
Ancient
33%
3
3
Dust II
57%
7
5
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
50%
12
9
Overpass
0%
0
39
Mirage
45%
22
13
Nuke
62%
21
2
Inferno
63%
24
0
Ancient
38%
8
17
Dust II
59%
17
3
Info
Match analysis of AVE vs LDLC by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between AVE and LDLC, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-2, on the following maps: Inferno, Nuke, Mirage, and victory was secured by LDLC. The MVP of this match was Keoz.
LDLC analytics
The team LDLC secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke, Mirage. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for LDLC were Keoz contributed 84 kills and hAdji contributed 75 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 33525 overall damage.
On the defensive side, LDLC held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
AVE analytics
The team AVE managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for AVE were Raijin contributed 67 kills and Porya contributed 64 kills. 30109 of total damage by AVE could not prevent LDLC from securing the victory
On the defensive side, AVE struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments