0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Rounds win streak
103
M4A1 kills on a map
184.6963
M4A1 damage (avg/round)
47.116.7
Damage (total/round)
40073
Damage (total/round)
40073
Player score (round)
37801012
Shots (total/round)
8616
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Ancient
59%
Inferno
48%
Nuke
47%
Vertigo
33%
Mirage
18%
Dust II
17%
Overpass
3%
Last 5 maps
Ancient
0%
0
5
Inferno
100%
1
4
Nuke
100%
2
0
Vertigo
67%
3
1
Mirage
80%
5
0
Dust II
50%
2
1
Overpass
67%
3
1
Last 5 maps
Ancient
59%
17
6
Inferno
52%
23
8
Nuke
53%
19
18
Vertigo
100%
2
51
Mirage
62%
21
8
Dust II
67%
21
7
Overpass
64%
11
21
Info
Match analysis of AVANGAR vs MAD Lions by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between AVANGAR and MAD Lions, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-1, on the following maps: Nuke, Dust II, Overpass, and victory was secured by AVANGAR. The MVP of this match was MICHU.
AVANGAR analytics
The team AVANGAR secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke, Overpass. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for AVANGAR were FinigaN contributed 64 kills and kade0 contributed 57 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 30822 overall damage.
On the defensive side, AVANGAR held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
MAD Lions analytics
The team MAD Lions managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for MAD Lions were MICHU contributed 80 kills and TMB contributed 57 kills. 30802 of total damage by MAD Lions could not prevent AVANGAR from securing the victory
On the defensive side, MAD Lions struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments