Teams advantage Inferno (M1)
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Nuke
50%
Inferno
37%
Anubis
37%
Dust II
33%
Vertigo
33%
Ancient
28%
Mirage
9%
Last 5 maps
Nuke
0%
0
25
Inferno
70%
30
1
Anubis
50%
38
4
Dust II
67%
12
8
Vertigo
33%
15
7
Ancient
48%
25
1
Mirage
65%
23
3
Last 5 maps
Nuke
50%
6
0
Inferno
33%
3
0
Anubis
13%
8
0
Dust II
100%
1
0
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Ancient
20%
10
0
Mirage
56%
9
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wwllw
- lllwl
Info
Map Analysis of Aurora Young Blud vs Lemondogs by the Bo3.gg Team
Aurora Young Blud on Inferno Analysis
Aurora Young Blud demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 19 out of 36 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Aurora Young Blud on Inferno were bl1x1, who contributed 28 kills, and gr1ks, who added 30 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 13561 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, Aurora Young Blud held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Lemondogs on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Lemondogs, as they managed to secure 17 out of 36 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Lemondogs on Inferno included Simpan, who contributed 33 kills, and hemzk9, who added 30 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 13263 total damage, Lemondogs couldn't prevent Aurora Young Blud from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, Lemondogs struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments