0 Comments
Teams advantage Inferno (M2)
Records Inferno
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:26s01:24s
Flash duration on a map (sec)
01:05s00:36s
Flash blinded on a map (opp)
5228
Smoke thrown on a map
1714.3232
Tec-9 kills on a map
21.3011
Tec-9 damage (avg/round)
17.13.6
Molotov damage (avg/round)
6.12
HE damage (avg/round)
18.93.4
GLOCK kills on a map
31.4516
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
17.54.2
Info
Map Analysis of Aurora Young Blud vs Gaimin Gladiators by the Bo3.gg Team
Aurora Young Blud on Inferno Analysis
Aurora Young Blud demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 13 out of 18 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Aurora Young Blud on Inferno were m1QUSE, who contributed 16 kills, and gr1ks, who added 14 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 7481 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, Aurora Young Blud held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Gaimin Gladiators on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Gaimin Gladiators, as they managed to secure 5 out of 18 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Gaimin Gladiators on Inferno included Queenix, who contributed 10 kills, and nicoodoz, who added 11 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 5515 total damage, Gaimin Gladiators couldn't prevent Aurora Young Blud from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, Gaimin Gladiators struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments