Aurora Scoreboard Nuke (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

21

18

3

+3

73

4:3

6

2

6.2

+4%

21

21

3

0

78

3:1

4

0

6.1

-4%

22

21

4

+1

78

4:5

7

0

6.0

-6%

16

21

4

-5

67

1:2

2

1

5.6

-5%

16

21

3

-5

49

3:4

1

0

5.1

-19%

Total

96

102

17

-6

346

15:15

20

3

5.8

-6%

MIBR Scoreboard Nuke (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

26

20

1

+6

85

5:1

8

0

6.7

+13%

21

16

5

+5

85

4:2

4

1

6.5

+7%

25

20

2

+5

96

5:5

7

0

6.5

+12%

17

23

4

-6

65

0:5

1

0

5.2

-23%

13

17

1

-4

52

1:2

3

0

5.0

-10%

Total

102

96

13

+6

382

15:15

23

1

6.0

0%

Teams advantage Nuke (M0)
Info
Map Analysis of Aurora vs MIBR by the Bo3.gg Team

Aurora on Nuke Analysis

Aurora demonstrated their prowers on Nuke, securing 16 out of 30 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Aurora on Nuke were latt1kk, who contributed 21 kills, and Norwi, who added 21 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Nuke, the team inflicted a total of 10388 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Nuke, Aurora held their ground firmly, successfully defending 12 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


MIBR on Nuke Analysis

Nuke proved to be a challenging battleground for MIBR, as they managed to secure 14 out of 30 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for MIBR on Nuke included saffee, who contributed 26 kills, and exit, who added 21 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 11470 total damage, MIBR couldn't prevent Aurora from securing victory on Nuke


On the defensive side of Nuke, MIBR struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 11 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date