0 Comments
114
152
32
-38
357
17:19
26
3
Anubis5.5
+41%
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Lineups
Lineup
Stand-in
Starter
Stand-in
Stand-in
Stand-in
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Overpass
57%
Anubis
57%
Nuke
50%
Mirage
47%
Inferno
20%
Ancient
10%
Vertigo
0%
Last 5 maps
Overpass
57%
7
7
Anubis
57%
7
7
Nuke
79%
14
1
Mirage
64%
11
5
Inferno
45%
11
11
Ancient
50%
18
1
Vertigo
0%
1
15
Last 5 maps
Overpass
0%
1
0
Anubis
0%
2
0
Nuke
29%
7
0
Mirage
17%
6
0
Inferno
25%
4
0
Ancient
40%
5
0
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wwwll
- lwlll
Info
Match analysis of ATOX vs Octagonal Disposition by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between ATOX and Octagonal Disposition, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Nuke, Anubis, and victory was secured by ATOX. The MVP of this match was kabal.
ATOX analytics
The team ATOX secured 26 out of 37 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke, Anubis. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for ATOX were kabal contributed 33 kills and MiQ contributed 33 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 15542 overall damage.
On the defensive side, ATOX held their ground firmly, successfully defending 12 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Octagonal Disposition analytics
The team Octagonal Disposition managed to secure 11 out of 37 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 1 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Octagonal Disposition were RainbowGod- contributed 27 kills and 0i contributed 27 kills. 12801 of total damage by Octagonal Disposition could not prevent ATOX from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Octagonal Disposition struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 10 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments