0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Galil kills on a map
41.8164
Galil damage (avg/round)
18.85.9
Molotov damage (avg/round)
152.1
USP damage (avg/round)
16.64.8
Galil kills on a map
41.8164
HE damage (avg/round)
11.53.4
Smoke thrown on a map
1714.5022
AK47 kills on a map
136.5019
AK47 damage (avg/round)
58.925.2
USP kills on a map
31.6027
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Mirage
69%
Anubis
40%
Nuke
23%
Inferno
12%
Dust II
7%
Ancient
4%
Vertigo
0%
Last 5 maps
Mirage
69%
13
4
Anubis
30%
10
4
Nuke
63%
8
1
Inferno
58%
26
0
Dust II
50%
6
7
Ancient
71%
28
1
Vertigo
0%
0
11
Last 5 maps
Mirage
0%
0
4
Anubis
70%
10
1
Nuke
40%
5
0
Inferno
70%
10
0
Dust II
57%
7
2
Ancient
67%
15
0
Vertigo
0%
0
3
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of ATOX vs IHC by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between ATOX and IHC, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Inferno, Ancient, and victory was secured by ATOX. The MVP of this match was ROUX.
ATOX analytics
The team ATOX secured 21 out of 40 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno, Ancient. They also successfully set 5 bombs during the match.
The standout players for ATOX were kabal contributed 28 kills and Annihilation contributed 23 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 14279 overall damage.
On the defensive side, ATOX held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
IHC analytics
The team IHC managed to secure 19 out of 40 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 2 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for IHC were ROUX contributed 35 kills and AccuracyTG contributed 32 kills. 15181 of total damage by IHC could not prevent ATOX from securing the victory
On the defensive side, IHC struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments