ATOX Scoreboard Anubis (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

18

18

3

0

88

2:4

6

0

6.1

+12%

16

17

5

-1

81

1:3

4

1

6.0

+2%

10

18

5

-8

59

4:2

1

1

5.7

-25%

14

19

1

-5

55

1:1

3

1

5.5

-7%

9

18

5

-9

63

0:4

1

0

4.5

-27%

Total

67

90

19

-23

345

8:14

15

3

5.6

-9%

GR Scoreboard Anubis (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

24

13

2

+11

103

2:2

6

0

7.8

+33%

20

14

7

+6

87

8:3

4

0

7.7

+9%

21

16

6

+5

93

3:0

7

0

7.3

+19%

12

13

9

-1

72

0:1

2

1

6.1

-10%

13

12

5

+1

65

1:2

2

0

5.8

+1%

Total

90

68

29

+22

419

14:8

21

1

6.9

+10%

Teams advantage Anubis (M2)
Info
Map Analysis of ATOX vs GR by the Bo3.gg Team

GR on Anubis Analysis

GR demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 13 out of 22 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for GR on Anubis were SALO_MUX, who contributed 24 kills, and weqt2, who added 20 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 9227 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Anubis, GR held their ground firmly, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


ATOX on Anubis Analysis

Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for ATOX, as they managed to secure 9 out of 22 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for ATOX on Anubis included MiQ, who contributed 18 kills, and kabal, who added 16 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7591 total damage, ATOX couldn't prevent GR from securing victory on Anubis


On the defensive side of Anubis, ATOX struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 1 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date