0 Comments
Teams advantage Inferno (M1)
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
53%
Ancient
44%
Dust II
16%
Overpass
9%
Inferno
6%
Mirage
6%
Nuke
5%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
17%
6
37
Ancient
56%
16
18
Dust II
45%
11
26
Overpass
65%
17
4
Inferno
69%
13
25
Mirage
50%
20
18
Nuke
58%
24
2
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
70%
20
6
Ancient
100%
1
53
Dust II
61%
23
5
Overpass
56%
16
13
Inferno
63%
19
18
Mirage
44%
9
27
Nuke
63%
27
7
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wlwll
- wwwwl
Info
Map Analysis of Astralis vs Eternal Fire by the Bo3.gg Team
Astralis on Inferno Analysis
Astralis demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 25 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Astralis on Inferno were blameF, who contributed 23 kills, and gla1ve, who added 17 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 9146 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, Astralis held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Eternal Fire on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Eternal Fire, as they managed to secure 9 out of 25 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Eternal Fire on Inferno included woxic, who contributed 18 kills, and MAJ3R, who added 18 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8752 total damage, Eternal Fire couldn't prevent Astralis from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, Eternal Fire struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments