0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Assists on a map
10.984.4098
Speed Round (sec)
00:22s01:55s
Speed Round (sec)
00:29s01:55s
Speed Round (sec)
00:23s01:55s
Teammate kills
1
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Inferno
100%
Overpass
100%
Ancient
67%
Mirage
20%
Vertigo
0%
Nuke
0%
Anubis
0%
Last 5 maps
Inferno
0%
0
0
Overpass
0%
0
0
Ancient
100%
1
0
Mirage
0%
0
0
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Nuke
0%
1
0
Anubis
0%
0
0
Last 5 maps
Inferno
100%
1
0
Overpass
100%
1
0
Ancient
33%
9
0
Mirage
20%
5
0
Vertigo
0%
1
0
Nuke
0%
0
0
Anubis
0%
1
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wwwl
- lwwll
Info
Match analysis of ARROW vs CPH Wolves by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between ARROW and CPH Wolves, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Ancient, and victory was secured by ARROW. The MVP of this match was Twiksar.
ARROW analytics
The team ARROW secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for ARROW were Twiksar contributed 17 kills and Kre1N contributed 16 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 5845 overall damage.
On the defensive side, ARROW held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
CPH Wolves analytics
The team CPH Wolves managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for CPH Wolves were Fessor contributed 12 kills and Svedjehed contributed 12 kills. 5624 of total damage by CPH Wolves could not prevent ARROW from securing the victory
On the defensive side, CPH Wolves struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments