0 Comments
Teams advantage Anubis (M1)
Lineups
Lineup
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Nuke
100%
Inferno
67%
Anubis
67%
Overpass
40%
Ancient
25%
Vertigo
0%
Mirage
0%
Last 5 maps
Nuke
100%
2
0
Inferno
67%
3
1
Anubis
67%
3
1
Overpass
40%
5
0
Ancient
25%
4
0
Vertigo
0%
1
2
Mirage
0%
0
2
Last 5 maps
Nuke
0%
1
0
Inferno
0%
0
0
Anubis
0%
0
0
Overpass
0%
0
0
Ancient
0%
0
0
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Mirage
0%
0
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
Info
Map Analysis of Arctic Raptors vs Heaven and Hell by the Bo3.gg Team
Arctic Raptors on Anubis Analysis
Arctic Raptors demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 16 out of 19 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Arctic Raptors on Anubis were Ducky, who contributed 22 kills, and MMS, who added 19 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 8798 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Anubis, Arctic Raptors held their ground firmly, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Heaven and Hell on Anubis Analysis
Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for Heaven and Hell, as they managed to secure 0 out of 19 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Heaven and Hell on Anubis included , who contributed 0 kills, and , who added 0 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 0 total damage, Heaven and Hell couldn't prevent Arctic Raptors from securing victory on Anubis
On the defensive side of Anubis, Heaven and Hell struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments