Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:33s01:30s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:32s01:30s
Flash blinded on a map (opp)
9830
Galil damage (avg/round)
20.15.6
Smoke thrown on a map
3515.0371
Shots (total/round)
8916
Shots (total/round)
9016
Player score (round)
35111012
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
3
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Overpass
86%
Mirage
67%
Vertigo
57%
Ancient
40%
Inferno
30%
Dust II
2%
Nuke
0%
Last 5 maps
Overpass
86%
7
1
Mirage
0%
1
4
Vertigo
0%
2
2
Ancient
60%
15
0
Inferno
50%
12
2
Dust II
62%
13
1
Nuke
60%
10
3
Last 5 maps
Overpass
0%
0
24
Mirage
67%
12
2
Vertigo
57%
7
1
Ancient
100%
4
8
Inferno
80%
5
11
Dust II
60%
15
2
Nuke
60%
10
10
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of ARCTIC vs Sharks by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between ARCTIC and Sharks, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-2, on the following maps: Ancient, Vertigo, and victory was secured by Sharks. The MVP of this match was togs.
Sharks analytics
The team Sharks secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient, Vertigo. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Sharks were togs contributed 58 kills and jnt contributed 51 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 24735 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Sharks held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
ARCTIC analytics
The team ARCTIC managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for ARCTIC were history contributed 50 kills and MaLLby contributed 40 kills. 23122 of total damage by ARCTIC could not prevent Sharks from securing the victory
On the defensive side, ARCTIC struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments