Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
11.43.8
Molotov damage (avg/round)
6.72
Player score (round)
45341012
Damage (total/round)
39573
Shots (total/round)
10116
Player score (round)
36011012
Shots (total/round)
8716
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
67%
Overpass
58%
Inferno
18%
Dust II
12%
Mirage
10%
Nuke
9%
Ancient
1%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
67%
9
13
Overpass
83%
18
9
Inferno
53%
15
8
Dust II
55%
20
3
Mirage
50%
2
22
Nuke
61%
23
4
Ancient
71%
17
5
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
0%
0
18
Overpass
25%
8
2
Inferno
71%
7
5
Dust II
67%
12
10
Mirage
40%
5
14
Nuke
70%
10
1
Ancient
70%
10
0
Info
Match analysis of ARCTIC vs ODDIK by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between ARCTIC and ODDIK, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Overpass, Nuke, and victory was secured by ARCTIC. The MVP of this match was ponter.
ARCTIC analytics
The team ARCTIC secured 32 out of 51 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Overpass, Nuke. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for ARCTIC were ponter contributed 46 kills and short contributed 40 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 20785 overall damage.
On the defensive side, ARCTIC held their ground firmly, successfully defending 18 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
ODDIK analytics
The team ODDIK managed to secure 19 out of 51 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 4 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for ODDIK were remix contributed 40 kills and RICIOLI contributed 32 kills. 17600 of total damage by ODDIK could not prevent ARCTIC from securing the victory
On the defensive side, ODDIK struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 11 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments