0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:28s01:25s
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
13.94.1
Tec-9 kills on a map
41.3014
Tec-9 damage (avg/round)
13.23.6
Molotov damage (avg/round)
6.22.1
Assists on a map
124.4315
Eco wins full buy
1
Player score (round)
40351010
Player score (round)
41561010
Multikill x-
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
33%
Vertigo
27%
Nuke
26%
Anubis
14%
Inferno
8%
Ancient
8%
Mirage
3%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
0%
2
6
Vertigo
83%
6
11
Nuke
50%
6
4
Anubis
60%
25
2
Inferno
56%
9
0
Ancient
42%
12
10
Mirage
57%
14
4
Last 5 maps
Dust II
33%
3
27
Vertigo
56%
34
4
Nuke
76%
42
0
Anubis
46%
26
19
Inferno
64%
11
36
Ancient
50%
28
27
Mirage
60%
42
10
Info
Match analysis of ARCRED vs Sashi by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between ARCRED and Sashi, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-2, on the following maps: Inferno, Nuke, Anubis, and victory was secured by Sashi. The MVP of this match was Cabbi.
Sashi analytics
The team Sashi secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno, Nuke. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Sashi were Cabbi contributed 54 kills and IceBerg contributed 54 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 25201 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Sashi held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
ARCRED analytics
The team ARCRED managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for ARCRED were Get_Jeka contributed 50 kills and SynyX contributed 47 kills. 23210 of total damage by ARCRED could not prevent Sashi from securing the victory
On the defensive side, ARCRED struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments