0 Comments
Teams advantage
Score
5.7
6.1
Ancient0.4
Win Rounds
8
16
Ancient8
Kills
78
93
Ancient15
Damage
8.67K
9.69K
Ancient1017
Economy
473.05K
515.8K
Ancient42750
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
f
100%
Mirage
60%
Inferno
57%
Nuke
f
28%
Overpass
25%
Ancient
17%
Vertigo
0%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
0%
0
1
Mirage
60%
5
0
Inferno
57%
7
0
Nuke
22%
9
1
Overpass
25%
4
1
Ancient
67%
9
0
Vertigo
0%
1
1
Last 5 maps
Dust II
100%
2
0
Mirage
0%
1
1
Inferno
0%
0
2
Nuke
50%
2
0
Overpass
0%
2
0
Ancient
50%
2
1
Vertigo
0%
0
2
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- lwlwl
- lll
Info
Match analysis of ARCRED vs flowstate by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between ARCRED and flowstate, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Ancient, and victory was secured by flowstate. The MVP of this match was Dima.
flowstate analytics
The team flowstate secured 24 out of 24 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient. They also successfully set 5 bombs during the match.
The standout players for flowstate were Dima contributed 25 kills and Kaide contributed 22 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 9689 overall damage.
On the defensive side, flowstate held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
ARCRED analytics
The team ARCRED managed to secure 0 out of 24 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for ARCRED were 1NVISIBLE contributed 21 kills and DSSj contributed 17 kills. 8672 of total damage by ARCRED could not prevent flowstate from securing the victory
On the defensive side, ARCRED struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments