0 Comments
75
82
27
-7
366
11:12
18
4
Anubis6.1
0%
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Nuke
67%
Anubis
45%
Vertigo
44%
Mirage
36%
Inferno
11%
Dust II
0%
Ancient
0%
Last 5 maps
Nuke
0%
1
3
Anubis
0%
3
1
Vertigo
100%
1
3
Mirage
0%
0
6
Inferno
33%
3
4
Dust II
0%
0
0
Ancient
0%
2
1
Last 5 maps
Nuke
67%
12
6
Anubis
45%
11
18
Vertigo
56%
16
6
Mirage
36%
11
18
Inferno
44%
16
4
Dust II
0%
0
4
Ancient
0%
0
31
Last results
Past matches
- lllll
- wllwl
Info
Match analysis of Arcade vs Bad News Kangaroos by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Arcade and Bad News Kangaroos, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Anubis, and victory was secured by Arcade. The MVP of this match was Versa.
Arcade analytics
The team Arcade secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps . They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Arcade were Versa contributed 23 kills and foggers contributed 18 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 8883 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Arcade held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Bad News Kangaroos analytics
The team Bad News Kangaroos managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Bad News Kangaroos were Omichella contributed 19 kills and apocdud contributed 21 kills. 8418 of total damage by Bad News Kangaroos could not prevent Arcade from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Bad News Kangaroos struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments