0 - 0
Mirage
8 - 13
Anubis
8 - 13
Apeks Scoreboard Anubis (M3)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

21

17

4

+4

105

5:2

5

0

7.7

+18%

15

15

7

0

71

0:4

4

0

5.5

+37%

12

15

4

-3

67

1:1

3

0

5.4

+8%

12

15

4

-3

66

0:3

4

1

5.4

0%

13

19

5

-6

61

1:4

4

0

5.0

-20%

Total

73

81

24

-8

370

7:14

20

1

5.8

+9%

System5 Scoreboard Anubis (M3)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

25

11

2

+14

110

2:0

6

2

8.5

+40%

17

18

7

-1

101

3:2

5

0

6.8

+24%

16

14

6

+2

75

4:2

6

0

6.3

+8%

14

14

8

0

80

3:1

3

0

6.3

+11%

9

16

10

-7

52

2:2

2

1

5.1

-23%

Total

81

73

33

+8

419

14:7

22

3

6.6

+12%

Teams advantage Anubis (M3)
Info
Map Analysis of Apeks vs System5 by the Bo3.gg Team

System5 on Anubis Analysis

System5 demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 13 out of 21 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for System5 on Anubis were Python, who contributed 25 kills, and Chill, who added 17 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 8806 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Anubis, System5 held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Apeks on Anubis Analysis

Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for Apeks, as they managed to secure 8 out of 21 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Apeks on Anubis included SLY, who contributed 21 kills, and Tapewaare, who added 15 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7771 total damage, Apeks couldn't prevent System5 from securing victory on Anubis


On the defensive side of Anubis, Apeks struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date