0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Galil damage (avg/round)
185.6
GLOCK kills on a map
41.4398
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
21.13.8
AK47 kills on a map
176.732
AK47 damage (avg/round)
6425.3
Damage (total/round)
45173
Shots (total/round)
8416
Shots (total/round)
8816
Player score (round)
43941012
Multikill x-
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Inferno
39%
Dust II
33%
Nuke
33%
Mirage
27%
Overpass
23%
Ancient
13%
Vertigo
3%
Last 5 maps
Inferno
33%
15
4
Dust II
27%
11
8
Nuke
33%
9
16
Mirage
25%
4
26
Overpass
55%
22
1
Ancient
58%
12
1
Vertigo
50%
8
20
Last 5 maps
Inferno
72%
32
2
Dust II
60%
15
2
Nuke
0%
0
34
Mirage
52%
21
5
Overpass
32%
19
14
Ancient
45%
11
8
Vertigo
53%
19
4
Info
Match analysis of Apeks vs EC Kyiv by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Apeks and EC Kyiv, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-2, on the following maps: Inferno, Overpass, Vertigo, and victory was secured by EC Kyiv. The MVP of this match was amster.
EC Kyiv analytics
The team EC Kyiv secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno, Vertigo. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for EC Kyiv were amster contributed 58 kills and uQlutzavr contributed 57 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 28410 overall damage.
On the defensive side, EC Kyiv held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Apeks analytics
The team Apeks managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Apeks were STYKO contributed 50 kills and AcilioN contributed 47 kills. 26002 of total damage by Apeks could not prevent EC Kyiv from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Apeks struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments