Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Clutch (opponents)
2
Clutch (opponents)
2
Teammate kills
1
Teammate kills
1
Suicide
1
HE damage (total/round)
9326.8
HE damage (total/round)
12526.8
Flash duration on a round (sec)
00:20s00:05s
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
123.8
Speed Round (sec)
00:28s01:54s
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Ancient
59%
Dust II
23%
Mirage
11%
Inferno
9%
Overpass
9%
Nuke
9%
Vertigo
5%
Last 5 maps
Ancient
59%
17
1
Dust II
27%
11
18
Mirage
64%
14
25
Inferno
42%
19
8
Overpass
58%
26
2
Nuke
31%
13
23
Vertigo
55%
11
23
Last 5 maps
Ancient
0%
0
7
Dust II
50%
2
2
Mirage
75%
8
0
Inferno
33%
3
6
Overpass
67%
3
2
Nuke
40%
5
0
Vertigo
60%
5
1
Info
Match analysis of Apeks vs AVANGAR by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Apeks and AVANGAR, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-1, on the following maps: Inferno, Mirage, Vertigo, and victory was secured by Apeks. The MVP of this match was FinigaN.
Apeks analytics
The team Apeks secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno, Vertigo. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Apeks were STYKO contributed 62 kills and jkaem contributed 62 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 29789 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Apeks held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
AVANGAR analytics
The team AVANGAR managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for AVANGAR were FinigaN contributed 71 kills and enzero contributed 55 kills. 29781 of total damage by AVANGAR could not prevent Apeks from securing the victory
On the defensive side, AVANGAR struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments