0 Comments
Teams advantage
Score
4
7.5
Overpass3.5
Win Rounds
0
16
Overpass16
Kills
30
77
Overpass47
Damage
3.35K
7.71K
Overpass4361
Economy
258K
440.8K
Overpass182800
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Ancient
61%
Inferno
59%
Mirage
58%
Dust II
55%
Vertigo
50%
Overpass
42%
Nuke
33%
Last 5 maps
Ancient
0%
1
0
Inferno
0%
0
0
Mirage
0%
0
0
Dust II
0%
0
0
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Overpass
0%
2
0
Nuke
0%
0
0
Last 5 maps
Ancient
61%
33
7
Inferno
59%
32
15
Mirage
58%
26
24
Dust II
55%
11
31
Vertigo
50%
8
43
Overpass
42%
33
2
Nuke
33%
12
34
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- l
- wwwlw
Info
Match analysis of Aokigahara vs PROSPECTS by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Aokigahara and PROSPECTS, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Overpass, and victory was secured by PROSPECTS. The MVP of this match was hype.
PROSPECTS analytics
The team PROSPECTS secured 0 out of 16 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Overpass. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for PROSPECTS were hype contributed 19 kills and spooke contributed 19 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 7710 overall damage.
On the defensive side, PROSPECTS held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Aokigahara analytics
The team Aokigahara managed to secure 16 out of 16 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Aokigahara were Dern1er contributed 7 kills and Bodik contributed 9 kills. 3349 of total damage by Aokigahara could not prevent PROSPECTS from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Aokigahara struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 1 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments