0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Speed Round (sec)
00:32s01:55s
Damage (total/round)
50073
Player score (round)
47301010
Player score (round)
34791010
Player's aces
1
Multikill x-
4
Speed Round (sec)
00:31s01:55s
Speed Round (sec)
00:22s01:55s
Player score (round)
37201010
Player score (round)
41771010
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Inferno
38%
Anubis
35%
Nuke
32%
Mirage
23%
Ancient
19%
Dust II
6%
Vertigo
0%
Last 5 maps
Inferno
0%
0
16
Anubis
67%
18
6
Nuke
33%
27
0
Mirage
27%
26
3
Ancient
50%
50
0
Dust II
27%
15
6
Vertigo
0%
7
5
Last 5 maps
Inferno
38%
8
4
Anubis
32%
19
3
Nuke
65%
26
0
Mirage
50%
24
3
Ancient
31%
35
0
Dust II
33%
9
5
Vertigo
0%
0
11
Last results
Info
Match analysis of Anonymo vs Heimo by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Anonymo and Heimo, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-2, on the following maps: Nuke, Ancient, and victory was secured by Heimo. The MVP of this match was arvid.
Heimo analytics
The team Heimo secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke, Ancient. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Heimo were arvid contributed 51 kills and Spargo contributed 46 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 23891 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Heimo held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Anonymo analytics
The team Anonymo managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Anonymo were Enzo contributed 45 kills and KukuBambo contributed 47 kills. 22547 of total damage by Anonymo could not prevent Heimo from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Anonymo struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments