0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:25s01:30s
AWP kills on a map
226.5798
AWP damage (avg/round)
62.621.6
Smoke thrown on a map
2615.0371
Damage (total/round)
40073
Player score (round)
35191012
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Inferno
47%
Overpass
30%
Ancient
22%
Mirage
13%
Vertigo
12%
Anubis
10%
Dust II
0%
Nuke
0%
Last 5 maps
Inferno
100%
6
24
Overpass
65%
17
5
Ancient
39%
18
8
Mirage
40%
15
9
Vertigo
56%
9
13
Anubis
50%
4
15
Dust II
0%
0
2
Nuke
40%
10
3
Last 5 maps
Inferno
53%
36
1
Overpass
35%
17
16
Ancient
61%
18
9
Mirage
53%
15
12
Vertigo
68%
25
3
Anubis
60%
5
19
Dust II
0%
0
2
Nuke
40%
5
32
Info
Match analysis of Anonymo vs ECLOT by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Anonymo and ECLOT, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Vertigo, Inferno, and victory was secured by Anonymo. The MVP of this match was SaMey.
Anonymo analytics
The team Anonymo secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Vertigo, Inferno. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Anonymo were SaMey contributed 44 kills and Sobol contributed 40 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 19724 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Anonymo held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
ECLOT analytics
The team ECLOT managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for ECLOT were nbqq contributed 35 kills and Dytor contributed 32 kills. 16935 of total damage by ECLOT could not prevent Anonymo from securing the victory
On the defensive side, ECLOT struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments