0 Comments
Teams advantage
Score
5.9
6
Mirage-0.1
Win Rounds
16
13
Mirage3
Kills
90
97
Mirage-7
Damage
10.13K
10.42K
Mirage-296
Economy
643.45K
539.5K
Mirage103950
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Nuke
a
67%
Inferno
62%
Vertigo
50%
Ancient
50%
Overpass
45%
Dust II
43%
Mirage
a
41%
Last 5 maps
Nuke
100%
1
0
Inferno
0%
1
0
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Ancient
0%
0
0
Overpass
0%
0
0
Dust II
0%
0
0
Mirage
100%
4
0
Last 5 maps
Nuke
33%
12
1
Inferno
62%
13
8
Vertigo
50%
14
3
Ancient
50%
8
10
Overpass
45%
22
2
Dust II
43%
7
11
Mirage
59%
34
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- ww
- wlllw
Info
Match analysis of ampiainensuoja vs ONYX by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between ampiainensuoja and ONYX, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Mirage, and victory was secured by ampiainensuoja. The MVP of this match was sl3nd.
ampiainensuoja analytics
The team ampiainensuoja secured 29 out of 29 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for ampiainensuoja were uli contributed 22 kills and Airax contributed 21 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 10159 overall damage.
On the defensive side, ampiainensuoja held their ground firmly, successfully defending 15 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
ONYX analytics
The team ONYX managed to secure 0 out of 29 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for ONYX were sl3nd contributed 30 kills and bodito contributed 26 kills. 10422 of total damage by ONYX could not prevent ampiainensuoja from securing the victory
On the defensive side, ONYX struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments