0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
M4A1 kills on a map
84.5517
Smoke thrown on a map
1714.8354
M4A1 kills on a map
114.5517
M4A1 damage (avg/round)
66.816.3
M4A1 kills on a map
94.5517
USP damage (avg/round)
14.44.7
AWP kills on a map
116.5449
AWP damage (avg/round)
64.621.7
USP damage (avg/round)
15.44.7
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
23.43.9
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
100%
Nuke
50%
Mirage
44%
Anubis
44%
Ancient
40%
Inferno
36%
Overpass
25%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
100%
2
0
Nuke
0%
0
1
Mirage
100%
1
1
Anubis
0%
0
3
Ancient
0%
0
3
Inferno
100%
1
0
Overpass
0%
0
0
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
0%
0
23
Nuke
50%
10
14
Mirage
56%
16
2
Anubis
44%
18
2
Ancient
40%
15
3
Inferno
64%
22
1
Overpass
25%
4
19
Info
Match analysis of AMKAL vs sYnck by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between AMKAL and sYnck, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Inferno, and victory was secured by AMKAL. The MVP of this match was TRAVIS.
AMKAL analytics
The team AMKAL secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for AMKAL were TRAVIS contributed 17 kills and icy contributed 20 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 7027 overall damage.
On the defensive side, AMKAL held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
sYnck analytics
The team sYnck managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for sYnck were Wahtzz contributed 11 kills and Jyo contributed 8 kills. 5071 of total damage by sYnck could not prevent AMKAL from securing the victory
On the defensive side, sYnck struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments