0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:29s01:25s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:26s01:25s
AK47 kills on a map
126.5019
AK47 damage (avg/round)
58.325.2
AK47 kills on a map
146.5019
AK47 damage (avg/round)
65.225.2
Player score (round)
40521010
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Anubis
48%
Nuke
22%
Mirage
14%
Ancient
6%
Inferno
4%
Dust II
3%
Vertigo
0%
Last 5 maps
Anubis
0%
0
44
Nuke
53%
19
6
Mirage
46%
13
15
Ancient
42%
12
25
Inferno
56%
18
2
Dust II
30%
10
0
Vertigo
58%
24
6
Last 5 maps
Anubis
48%
25
18
Nuke
75%
40
0
Mirage
60%
42
9
Ancient
48%
27
26
Inferno
60%
10
35
Dust II
33%
3
24
Vertigo
58%
33
4
Info
Match analysis of AMKAL vs Sashi by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between AMKAL and Sashi, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Nuke, and victory was secured by Sashi. The MVP of this match was IceBerg.
Sashi analytics
The team Sashi secured 13 out of 20 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke. They also successfully set 3 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Sashi were IceBerg contributed 20 kills and Lucky contributed 17 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 7271 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Sashi held their ground firmly, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
AMKAL analytics
The team AMKAL managed to secure 7 out of 20 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 3 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for AMKAL were topo contributed 11 kills and nota contributed 16 kills. 6057 of total damage by AMKAL could not prevent Sashi from securing the victory
On the defensive side, AMKAL struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments