0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:35s01:25s
AK47 kills on a map
136.5019
Tec-9 damage (avg/round)
12.73.6
Tec-9 kills on a map
31.3014
Tec-9 damage (avg/round)
13.23.6
Galil kills on a map
41.8164
Galil damage (avg/round)
18.95.9
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
13.54.1
AK47 damage (avg/round)
59.925.2
Multikill x-
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
58%
Dust II
39%
Anubis
39%
Mirage
25%
Inferno
11%
Ancient
9%
Nuke
3%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
58%
26
6
Dust II
36%
11
0
Anubis
0%
0
47
Mirage
43%
14
16
Inferno
55%
20
2
Ancient
46%
13
27
Nuke
50%
20
6
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
0%
0
30
Dust II
75%
20
6
Anubis
39%
23
8
Mirage
68%
22
3
Inferno
44%
18
6
Ancient
55%
40
1
Nuke
53%
15
11
Info
Match analysis of AMKAL vs GUN5 by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between AMKAL and GUN5, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Ancient, Inferno, and victory was secured by AMKAL. The MVP of this match was TRAVIS.
AMKAL analytics
The team AMKAL secured 22 out of 35 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient, Inferno. They also successfully set 7 bombs during the match.
The standout players for AMKAL were TRAVIS contributed 35 kills and nota contributed 29 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 13369 overall damage.
On the defensive side, AMKAL held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
GUN5 analytics
The team GUN5 managed to secure 13 out of 35 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 1 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for GUN5 were kelieN contributed 23 kills and Easy contributed 20 kills. 12620 of total damage by GUN5 could not prevent AMKAL from securing the victory
On the defensive side, GUN5 struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments