AMKAL Scoreboard Mirage (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

20

11

5

+9

93

3:1

6

0

7.6

+21%

22

16

4

+6

102

1:3

5

0

7.3

+24%

17

10

3

+7

76

3:2

3

0

6.6

+12%

13

16

8

-3

82

1:2

3

0

5.7

-3%

9

13

1

-4

47

4:2

1

0

5.2

-23%

Total

81

66

21

+15

399

12:10

18

0

6.5

+6%

Guild Eagles Scoreboard Mirage (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

12

16

4

-4

63

1:2

3

1

5.9

-5%

14

15

5

-1

75

2:3

2

0

5.9

+2%

13

17

5

-4

73

1:1

3

0

5.6

-8%

11

15

1

-4

69

3:2

3

0

5.5

-13%

15

18

3

-3

64

3:4

3

0

5.5

-12%

Total

65

81

18

-16

343

10:12

14

1

5.7

-7%

Teams advantage Mirage (M2)
Info
Map Analysis of AMKAL vs Guild Eagles by the Bo3.gg Team

AMKAL on Mirage Analysis

AMKAL demonstrated their prowers on Mirage, securing 13 out of 22 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for AMKAL on Mirage were Forester, who contributed 20 kills, and Sdaim, who added 22 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Mirage, the team inflicted a total of 8782 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Mirage, AMKAL held their ground firmly, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Guild Eagles on Mirage Analysis

Mirage proved to be a challenging battleground for Guild Eagles, as they managed to secure 9 out of 22 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Guild Eagles on Mirage included SENER1, who contributed 12 kills, and sinnopsyy, who added 14 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7542 total damage, Guild Eagles couldn't prevent AMKAL from securing victory on Mirage


On the defensive side of Mirage, Guild Eagles struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date