Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Galil kills on a map
51.8171
Galil damage (avg/round)
30.25.8
Flash duration on a map (sec)
01:11s00:37s
Galil kills on a map
51.8171
Galil damage (avg/round)
25.35.8
HE damage (avg/round)
11.73.4
AK47 kills on a map
116.5888
Player score (round)
35611011
Clutch (opponents)
2
Flash duration on a round (sec)
00:22s00:05s
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Anubis
33%
Nuke
25%
Vertigo
18%
Mirage
17%
Inferno
8%
Ancient
5%
Last 5 maps
Anubis
33%
9
17
Nuke
33%
3
23
Vertigo
41%
17
15
Mirage
75%
4
24
Inferno
38%
8
21
Ancient
65%
26
1
Last 5 maps
Anubis
0%
0
37
Nuke
58%
12
11
Vertigo
59%
17
4
Mirage
58%
12
8
Inferno
46%
13
3
Ancient
60%
10
25
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of fnatic vs AMKAL by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between fnatic and AMKAL, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-1, on the following maps: Vertigo, Ancient, Inferno, and victory was secured by fnatic. The MVP of this match was MATYS.
fnatic analytics
The team fnatic secured 27 out of 46 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Vertigo, Inferno. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for fnatic were MATYS contributed 38 kills and afro contributed 31 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 17594 overall damage.
On the defensive side, fnatic held their ground firmly, successfully defending 14 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
AMKAL analytics
The team AMKAL managed to secure 19 out of 46 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 4 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for AMKAL were Forester contributed 33 kills and icy contributed 36 kills. 15142 of total damage by AMKAL could not prevent fnatic from securing the victory
On the defensive side, AMKAL struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 11 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments