0 Comments
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Inferno
43%
Nuke
41%
Train
33%
Dust II
31%
Anubis
18%
Mirage
2%
Ancient
2%
Last 5 maps
Inferno
73%
11
1
Nuke
63%
8
14
Train
0%
3
6
Dust II
61%
23
1
Anubis
43%
7
25
Mirage
60%
15
11
Ancient
54%
24
10
Last 5 maps
Inferno
30%
20
36
Nuke
22%
9
47
Train
33%
3
8
Dust II
30%
23
26
Anubis
61%
70
2
Mirage
58%
38
4
Ancient
56%
54
7
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wlwww
- wwlwl
Info
Map Analysis of AMKAL vs CYBERSHOKE by the Bo3.gg Team
CYBERSHOKE on Ancient Analysis
CYBERSHOKE demonstrated their prowers on Ancient, securing 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for CYBERSHOKE on Ancient were , who contributed 0 kills, and , who added 0 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Ancient, the team inflicted a total of 0 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Ancient, CYBERSHOKE held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
AMKAL on Ancient Analysis
Ancient proved to be a challenging battleground for AMKAL, as they managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for AMKAL on Ancient included , who contributed 0 kills, and , who added 0 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 0 total damage, AMKAL couldn't prevent CYBERSHOKE from securing victory on Ancient
On the defensive side of Ancient, AMKAL struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments