Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
13.44
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
11.14
HE damage (avg/round)
13.53.4
USP kills on a map
31.6074
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
13.64
Flash duration on a map (sec)
01:12s00:37s
Flash blinded on a map (opp)
4629
Molotov damage (avg/round)
7.42
Shots (total/round)
8716
Damage (total/round)
38573
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Anubis
48%
Inferno
47%
Nuke
8%
Ancient
8%
Vertigo
1%
Mirage
0%
Last 5 maps
Anubis
0%
0
41
Inferno
47%
15
3
Nuke
58%
12
11
Ancient
60%
10
28
Vertigo
57%
21
4
Mirage
64%
14
9
Last 5 maps
Anubis
48%
29
17
Inferno
0%
0
67
Nuke
50%
22
11
Ancient
52%
29
16
Vertigo
56%
9
22
Mirage
64%
33
2
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of AMKAL vs BetBoom by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between AMKAL and BetBoom, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Vertigo, Mirage, and victory was secured by AMKAL. The MVP of this match was Sdaim.
AMKAL analytics
The team AMKAL secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Vertigo, Mirage. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for AMKAL were Sdaim contributed 18 kills and Forester contributed 15 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 7309 overall damage.
On the defensive side, AMKAL held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
BetBoom analytics
The team BetBoom managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for BetBoom were s1ren contributed 11 kills and zorte contributed 13 kills. 6114 of total damage by BetBoom could not prevent AMKAL from securing the victory
On the defensive side, BetBoom struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments